Tariq Thachil is the Director of CASI, Associate Professor of Political Science at Penn, and the Madan Lal Sobti Chair for the Study of Contemporary India as of July 1, 2020.
Professor Thachil replaces Marshall M. Bouton (Acting Director & Visiting Scholar, 2018-20) and Devesh Kapur (Director, 2006-18). CASI was founded in 1992 by Francine R. Frankel (Director, 1992-2006).
Prior to arriving at Penn, Professor Thachil was Associate Professor of Political Science at Vanderbilt University, and before that was Peter Strauss Family Assistant Professor of Political Science at Yale University. He holds a B.A. in Economics from Stanford University (2003), and a Ph.D in Government from Cornell University (2009).
His research examines political parties and political behavior, identity politics, and urbanization with a regional focus on India. His first book, Elite Parties, Poor Voters: How Social Services Win Votes in India (Cambridge 2014)—an examination of the growing success of the Bharatiya Janata Party among disadvantaged electorates—won numerous awards from the American Political Science Association, including the 2015 Gregory Luebbert Award for best book in comparative politics and the 2015 Leon Epstein Award for best book on political parties.
Professor Thachil's current research focuses on the political consequences of urbanization in India. An article from this project received the 2018 Heinz I. Eulau Award for the best article published in the American Political Science Review. His articles are published or forthcoming in a number of journals, including the American Journal of Political Science, American Political Science Review, Comparative Politics, Comparative Political Studies, Journal of Politics, and World Politics. He frequently writes for press outlets in India, including The Indian Express and Hindustan Times.
Articles & Essays
Published Works
- “Cultivating Clients: Reputation, Responsiveness, and Ethnic Indifference in India’s Slums.” (with Adam Auerbach). Forthcoming, American Journal of Political Science. Featured in India in Transition, The Hindu Business Line.
- Honorable Mention for Best Paper Award, Comparative Democratization Section, APSA.
- “Does Police Repression Unite or Divide Poor Migrants? Evidence from Urban Indian Marketplaces.” Forthcoming, Journal of Politics. Featured in The Print.
- "How Clients Select Brokers: Competition and Choice in India's Slums." (with Adam Auerbach). 2018. American Political Science Review 112, 4 (November): 775-791. Featured in Livemint, India in Transition, Ideas4India, and The Economic Times.
- 2018 Heinz I. Eulau Prize for best article published in the APSR in a calendar year, APSA.
- "Improving Surveys Through Ethnography: Insights from India's Urban Periphery." 2018. Studies in Comparative International Development, 53, 3 (September): 281-299.
- “The Strategic and Moral Imperatives of Local Engagement: Reflections on India." (with Milan Vaishnav). 2018. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51, 3 (July): 546-549.
- "Do Rural Migrants Divide Ethnically in the City? Evidence from an Ethnographic Experiment in India." 2017. American Journal of Political Science, 61, 4 (October): 908-926. Featured in Livemint.
- "Ethnic Parties and Public Spending: New Theory in Evidence from the Indian States" (with Emmanuel Teitelbaum). 2015. Comparative Political Studies, 48, 11 (September): 1389-1420.
- “Elite Parties and Poor Voters: Theory and Evidence from India.” 2014. American Political Science Review, 108, (May): 454-477. Online supplement.
- “Embedded Mobilization: Nonstate Service Provision as Electoral Strategy in India.” 2011. World Politics, 63 (July): 434-469. Featured in the Wall Street Journal’s India Real Time blog and Business Standard.
- “Neoliberalism’s Two Faces in Asia: Globalization, Educational Policies, and Religious Schooling in India, Pakistan and Malaysia.” 2009. Comparative Politics, 41 (July): 473-494.
- “Poor Choices: Dealignment, Development and Dalit/Adivasi voting patterns in Indian states” (with Ronald Herring). 2008. Contemporary South Asia, 16 (December): 441-64.
Other Writing:
- Thachil, Tariq. 2019. ‘How does poor service delivery shape politics in clientelist settings?’ APSA Annals of Comparative Democratization, Vol. 17, No. 3 (September).
- Thachil, Tariq (with Yogendra Yadav, Vandita Mishra, Shekhar Gupta, and G. Sampath). 2019. “Making sense of the 2019 General Election,” Seminar, 720, (August 2019).
- Thachil, Tariq (with Adam Auerbach). 2016. "India's Slum Leaders: Part 1." India in Transition, Center for the Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania.
- reprinted in The Hindu Business Line and Ideas4India.
- Thachil, Tariq (with Adam Auerbach). 2016. "India's Slum Leaders: Part 2." India in Transition, Center for the Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania.
- reprinted in The Hindu Business Line and Ideas4India.
- Thachil, Tariq. 2011. Book Review. “Christophe Jaffrelot and Sanjay Kumar, Rise of the Plebians.” Pacific Affairs, 84 (September): 592-4.
- Thachil, Tariq. 2010. “Do Policies Matter in Indian Elections?” India in Transition, Center for the Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania.
Book Reviews:
- Thachil, Tariq. 2019. “Tarangini Sriraman, In Pursuit of Proof.” Studies in Indian Politics 7(2): 285-287.
- Thachil, Tariq. 2018. “Sanjay Ruparelia, Divided We Govern." Journal of Asian Studies, 77(3): 833-835.
- Thachil, Tariq. 2015. “Melani Cammett and Lauren MacLean. The Politics of Non-State Social Welfare.” Perspectives on Politics, 13(3): 880-882.
- Thachil, Tariq. 2011. “Christophe Jaffrelot and Sanjay Kumar, Rise of the Plebians.” Pacific Affairs, 84 (September): 592-4.
Media
Op-Eds:
- Thachil, Tariq. “Despite Covid-19, why did migrant workers go back?” Hindustan Times, April 3, 2020.
- Thachil, Tariq. “India’s Elections Results were more than a ‘Modi Wave’.” The Monkey Cage Blog at The Washington Post, May 31, 2019.
- Thachil, Tariq. “In India, the world’s largest election has started. Keep an eye on these five things.” The Monkey Cage Blog at The Washington Post, April 12, 2019.
- Thachil, Tariq. "Do Rural Migrants Favor Caste or Class in the City", Livemint, October 4th, 2017.
- Thachil, Tariq. "The People Tree Needs Deep Roots" Outlook. December 8th, 2014.
- Thachil, Tariq. "Facing Off." Caravan. April 1st, 2014. Mention: Financial Times.
- Thachil, Tariq. “Counting on cities.” The Indian Express. December 30th, 2013.
- Thachil, Tariq. “The strength of a leader.” The Indian Express. October 12th, 2013.
- Thachil, Tariq. “Is Indian Politics Populist?” The Indian Express. September 4th, 2013.
- Thachil, Tariq. “Can Hindutva Win Votes?” The Indian Express. February 2nd, 2013.
- Thachil, Tariq. “The Shadow in the Middle.” The Indian Express. September 28th, 2012.
Interviews and Presentations:
- Indian Express (with Sushant Singh): “India’s Coronavirus lockdown will spotlight migrants’ role in cities’.”
- Brown Book Adda on Elite Parties, Poor Voters (Video) with Ashutosh Varshney, Rebecca Weitz-Shapiro, Dan Slater, and Patrick Heller)
- Book Discussion at Carnegie Institute Endowment for International Peace (with Adam Ziegfeld and Milan Vaishnav).
- Yale University Macmillan Center (Video)
- Scroll India (with Seema Sirohi)
- Social Science Research Council
In-Progress
Manuscript:
Migrants and Machines: How Political Networks Form in Urbanizing India
How do party machines emerge in contexts of rapid urbanization and fluid population movement? A venerable literature in American and comparative politics has studied machine politics. Party machines are defined by their hierarchical organizational structures that link ordinary voters to political elites through tiered layers of political brokers, the lowest level of whom are entrenched in local neighborhoods and have face-to-face ties with voters. Much of the literature on party machines has focused on how these organizations distribute benefits to voters. More recently, scholars have examined how machines solve commitment problems inherent to such quid pro quo exchanges (ensuring brokers do not shirk, and voters reciprocate at the polls). These accounts, however, overwhelmingly treat machine organizations—and the local political brokers who give them a physical presence on the ground—as static givens.
Consequently, we lack an understanding of how party machines form, and how these formative processes affect how machines function—both during elections as well as between the votes. Migrants and Machines seeks to fill this gap. We argue that machine organizations take shape through interlocking processes of competitive selection among three levels of actors: voters (or clients), intermediaries (brokers), and politicians (patrons). Examining these processes of selection addresses several fundamental questions at the core of the study of party organization and distributive politics: how political brokers climb into positions of informal authority within localities; how, given scarce patronage resources, political brokers choose which local voters to cultivate as clients; and how political elites decide which local brokers to bring within their party network.
Empirically, we study these questions within the proliferating slums of India’s ballooning cities. Urban slums are a productive setting for our inquiry. Due to their low-income status, as well as the informal nature of their housing and employment, the poor migrants who reside in slums have long been viewed as preferred target populations for political machines. The relative newness of these settlements in India’s cities ensures the construction of party machine networks is a competitive and ongoing process. Slums are also of increasing substantive importance, given the rapid urbanization that is taking place across much of Asia and Africa. Yet systematic studies of slum politics remain rare. Within our study cities—Jaipur, Rajasthan and Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh—we draw on a wealth of original data, including a combined two years of ethnographic fieldwork, surveys and survey experiments conducted with 2,199 slum residents, 629 slum brokers, and 343 local city patrons.
Our findings show why questions of organizational emergence and political selection should be central to studies of machine politics, political brokerage, and distributive politics. We outline how a focus on competitive selection generates an array of insights on the agency of clients in shaping the machines that govern them, the motivations of brokers in joining machines, and the relative marginality of ethnicity in structuring machine organizations. Such insights, in turn, challenge conventional assumptions of representation, accountability, and responsiveness within clientelist politics, and the political consequences of urbanization across the Global South.
Papers:
“The Impact of Seasonal Migration on Political Beliefs and Social Norms.” (with Ahmed Mushfiq Mobarak, Maira Emy Reimao, and Ashish Shenoy).
“Rethinking India and the Study of Electoral Politics in the Developing World.” (with Adam Auerbach, Jennifer Bussell, Simon Chauchard, Francesca Jensenius, Gareth Nellis, Mark Schneider, Neelanjan Sircar, Pavithra Suryanarayan, Milan Vaishnav, Rahul Verma, Adam Ziegfeld).
“Governance in Small Cities” (with Adam Auerbach).